Analysis of Contractual Based Construction Implementation and Self-Managed Construction Implementation Based on Community Empowerment
Main Article Content
Aki’ Suprapto*
Esti Wulandari
Hanie Teki Tjendani
This research aims to determine community empowerment-based self-management construction projects and contractual-based construction projects in Sumenep District, using the AHP (Analytical Hierachy Process) method. The AHP method is used to analyze the results of the questionnaire so that the weight value of the criteria and sub criteria can be known as the basis for selecting the implementation of construction activities. Based on the results of the analysis of alternative construction implementation contractual weight is 0.501 and community empowerment is 0.499. The implementation of contractual-based construction projects is preferred with consideration of a more organized implementation, both in time (time schedule) and regulations governing it such as sanctions and fines when there are obstacles in the field being part of the responsibility for the implementation of contractual-based construction. Contractual-based construction implementation tends to be more organized and in accordance with strict schedules and regulations, including sanctions and fines if there are obstacles in the field. In contrast, self-managed construction based on community empowerment, such as in the village fund program, often has leeway in terms of a longer implementation period and supervision carried out by the community itself, not by experts. Thus, stakeholders are expected to clarify the regulations governing which works are carried out in a self-managed manner and which works are carried out contractually in government programs.
Achmad, & Misnaini. (2021). Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Desa Duwet Panarukan Situbondo. Al-Idarah?: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Islam, 2(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.35316/idarah.2021.v2i2.45-58
Aziiz, M. N., & Prastiti, S. D. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi akuntabilitas dana desa. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 6(2), 334–344.
Cahyono, L., Apriani, M., Nugraha, A. T., & Utomo, A. P. (2022). Potensi Risiko Waktu Pelaksanaan Proyek Swakelola di Kabupaten Pasuruan melalui Program Kotaku Kementerian PUPR. Jurnal Spektran, 10(2), 118.
Jamal. (2021). Analisis Success Factor Manajemen Sistem Konsentrasi Manajemen Konstruksi Program Studi Teknik Sipil – Program Magister Fakultas Teknik Sipil Dan Perencanaan Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.
Muhendra, H., & Hasibuan, S. (2018). Seleksi Sub-Kontraktor Proyek Konstruksi Jalan Layang. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik (JMTRANSLOG), 5(1), 43–54.
Nugroho, L. D., Witjaksana, B., Oetomo, W., & Setiawan, A. (2019). Analysis of Construction Contract Project Comparison with PNPM Based Projects in Construction Projects (PPIP Project Implementation Study in Tuban District). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1364(1), 12052.
Setiawan, A. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Proyek Kontrak Konstruksi Dengan Proyek Berbasis PNPM Pada Proyek Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Proyek PPIP Di Kabupaten Tuban). Universitas 17 Agustus 1945.
Soetjipto, J. W., Hanafi, M. N., & Sukmawati, S. (2021). Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Metode Konstruksi Berbasis Analytical Hierarchy Process. Konstruksia, 12(2), 1–13.
Sudrajat, E. C., & Kusdian, R. D. (2021). Evaluasi Proyek Pekerjaan Konstruksi Secara Kontraktual dan Pekerjaan Konstruksi Berbasis Masyarakat. Seminar Nasional Ketekniksipilan, Infrastruktur Dan Industri Jasa Konstruksi (KIIJK), 1(1), 463–472.
Yulianto, A. H., Witjaksana, B., & Tjendani, H. T. (2022). Perencanaan Tekn?s Dan B?aya Kontruks? Tempat Pembuangan Sementara (Tps) Sampah Berbas?s Masyarakat Desa P?ngg?r Papas Kecamatan Kal?anget Kabupaten Sumenep. Senakama: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1(1), 87–97.
Zulkarnain, I. (2019). Model Penetapan Proyek Konstruksi Sistem Kontraktual Atau Berbasis Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Teknologi Sipil, 1.
