Analysis on the AIDCA Method in Website UX Design Copywriting
Main Article Content
Fatkhur Rochman*
Abdul Waris S.
Eko Boedhi Santoso
Izzatul Ulya
This study aims to evaluate the quality of copywriting on the Papillon's Sisters website using the Heuristic Evaluation method which focuses on the AIDCA model (Attention, Interest, Desire, Conviction, Action). The evaluation is conducted through direct observation of the main pages of the site, using an AIDCA-based checklist to measure the effectiveness of copywriting in attracting attention, maintaining interest, arousing desire, building conviction, and encouraging user action. The data collected was analysed qualitatively by giving a severity rating to each problem found, ranging from Good Practice to Major Issue. The results showed that copywriting on the website has some strengths in terms of consistency of writing and attractive visuals, but there are deficiencies in the emotional aspects of language, lack of detailed product descriptions, and ineffective calls-to-action. From the evaluation, 5 major issues, 4 normal issues, 2 minor issues, and 1 good practice were found. This research provides recommendations for improvement, such as the use of more emotional language and improved visual layout to increase user engagement and conversion on the Papillon's Sisters website.
Agrawal, M., & Dhar, D. (2021). Enhancing User Experience of E-commerce Platforms—A Case Study of B2C Applications in the Indian Market. Design for Tomorrow—Volume 1: Proceedings of ICoRD 2021, 503–516.
Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F., & Mayer, R. (2009). Internet marketing: strategy, implementation and practice. Pearson education.
Cialdini, R. B., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Vol. 55). Collins New York.
Fadli, M. R. (2020). Perancangan user interface dan user experience pada aplikasi mobile indosport dengan menggunakan pendekatan user centered design. Peranc. User Interface Dan User Exp. Pada Apl. Mob. IndoSport Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan User Centered Des, 21(1), 1–9.
Fard, S. H. (2021). The Morality of Social Movements. University of Cincinnati.
Ghan?, M. S. A. A., & Shamsudd?n, S. N. O. R. W. A. N. (2020). Definitions and concepts of user experience (UX): A literature review. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage (TENIAT), 8(1), 130–143.
Guo, F. (2012). More Than Usability: The Four Elements of User Experience, Part I. UX Matters, 24.
Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. Random House.
Hidayatullah, D. (2018). Chemical Information and Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 53(9), 8–24.
Jensen, R. K., Agersted, M. E. I., Nielsen, H. A., & O’Neill, S. (2020). A cross-sectional study of website claims related to diagnoses and treatment of non-musculoskeletal conditions. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 28, 1–8.
Lewis, E. S. (1903). Financial advertising.
Lindstrom, M. (2011). Brand sense: Sensory secrets behind the stuff we buy. Simon and Schuster.
Munthe-Kaas, H., Bohren, M. A., Glenton, C., Lewin, S., Noyes, J., Tunçalp, Ö., Booth, A., Garside, R., Colvin, C. J., & Wainwright, M. (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implementation Science, 13, 25–32.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability inspection methods. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 413–414.
Putri, A. F., Hartati, T., & Purwinarti, T. (2017). Analisis konten kreatif pada fanpage facebook cadbury dairy milk tahun 2016. EPIGRAM (e-Journal), 14(2).
Ramadhani, S. N. (2020). Peran Copywriter dalam meningkatkan brand awareness PT. Himiko Medika Utama Semarang.
Sekar, M. (2019). Mengenal Heuristic Evaluation dalam UX Design. Medium. Com.
Trijanto, A. (2001). Copywriting: Seni mengasah kreativitas dan memahami bahasa iklan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Yogantari, M. V., & Ariesta, I. G. B. B. B. (2021). Kajian Pengaruh Copywriting Kreatif Terhadap Identitas Brand Kedai Kopi Takeaway Di Denpasar. Jurnal Nawala Visual, 3(1), 8–16.
